Lawyers representing businessman Richard Nii Armah Quaye have issued a formal response to claims made by his ex-wife, Joana Coffie, as their divorce dispute continues to attract public attention.
The development follows recent public statements from both parties after an interview granted by Quaye on a media platform hosted by Deloris Frimpong Manso.
In a prior statement, lawyers for Joana Coffie, led by Godfred Yeboah Dame, indicated that she played a role in the establishment of Quick Credit & Investment Micro-Credit Company Limited, citing documents and court-related records to support their position.
READ ALSO: Lawyers for Angel Maxine Reject Retraction Demand from Ntim Fordjour
However, Quaye’s legal team, Sory & Partners, has challenged several aspects of those claims in a response dated April 28, 2026.
According to the statement, assertions that Quaye had no assets or employment upon returning to Ghana in 2009 are inaccurate. The lawyers argued that such claims are not supported by court findings and should be viewed in that context.
The firm also disputed suggestions that ownership and shareholding issues relating to the company are part of the ongoing divorce proceedings, stating that such matters were not included in the legal reliefs before the court.
On allegations of abuse raised in earlier claims, the legal team firmly denied the assertions, maintaining that their client has consistently rejected such accusations. They referenced previous court proceedings, indicating that certain claims were not upheld.
READ ALSO: Nana Ama McBrown Shares Plans to Travel and Enjoy Life at 50
Additionally, the lawyers dismissed suggestions that Quaye had obstructed justice, describing those claims as unfounded.
The dispute highlights the complexities that can arise in high-profile divorce cases, especially when business interests and public narratives intersect.
As both parties continue to present their positions through legal channels, the matter remains subject to interpretation within the framework of the law, with no final determination yet made on the contested issues.
